Binding Chaos

The world is long overdue for a completely new system of governance.

If there was ever a need for political representation or a paternalistic and opaque authority it has been removed by technology. Every political system we have tried has proven incapable of protecting human rights and dignity. Every political system we have tried has devolved into oligarchy. To effect the change we require immediately, to give individuals control and responsibility, to bring regional systems under regional governance, allow global collaboration and protect the heritage of future generations, we need a new political model.

Hard copy is expensive because colour inside. Feel free to print the PDF in black and white instead.

Amazon
CreateSpace store
Binding Chaos PDF 6 X 9
Binding Chaos PDF 8.5 X 11
Enlazando Caos Spanish, thanks very much to Sandra Bit (@ebitlution) for translation.
ePub version thanks very much to Kevin Beynon

Share in any way you like with attribution (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0). Linkback to here if possible.

Pay what you feel is fair. Anything I earn gives me more time to write.
Through Bitpay
Through Paypal
Ongoing support through Gittip

If you do anything interesting with the text, leave a link in the comments and I’ll link to translations, different file formats, etc.

In this interview I try to answer the most common questions people have about Binding Chaos.

And here is How to replace your democracy with governance by the people.

#opDeathEaters FAQ

OpDeathEaters- FAQ image

Translations:

French FAQ: http://faqopmangemorts.tumblr.com/

Spanish FAQ: http://opdeatheatersmx.tumblr.com/opdeatheatersmxfaq

Dutch FAQ: http://opdeatheatersnl.tumblr.com/post/110350807808/veel-gestelde-vragen-faq

Polish FAQ: http://kanonuk.tumblr.com/post/110820551643/opdeatheaters-faq-pl

Hey guys if you are new to ‪#‎OpDeathEaters‬ don’t be afraid to ask questions, feel free to ask us anything you would like more information on or explained. Check below for what we have already answered. We’ll try to answer your questions as soon as possible.

Follow us on twitter: @OpDeathEaters 

Like the OpDeathEaters FB page: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Operation-Death-Eaters/1614742598745608

Join the conversation on the OPDE FB group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1522133861392796/

OpDeathEaters Database FAQ: http://operationdb.tumblr.com/faq

Ask your questions below

Q: What is the objective of #OpDeathEaters?

A: The objective of #OpDeathEaters is an independent, internationally linked, victim-led inquiry/tribunal into the child trafficking and paedosadist industry.

Q: What do all those words mean?

A: Independent of all institutions potentially being investigated for complicity. 

Autonomous to each region but internationally communicating and co-operating.

Run by qualified and experienced people who the victims and general public can trust.

Legally binding inquiry to gather evidence for the justice system unless the justice system is deemed by the public to be so corrupt that independent, legally binding tribunals are necessary.

Paedosadist industry includes all the industries using children as products, whether for rape, other sadism, ritual killings, labour slavery, organs, drugs and trafficking mules or militias. These industries are impossible to separate.

What is happening on February, Friday the 13th?

#OpDeathEaters Solidarity for Independent Inquiries

Press Release: https://anoninsiders.net/anonymous-operation-death-eaters-press-release-2902/

Join The Day of Protest Event: February, Friday the 13th, 2015: https://www.facebook.com/events/1413710862255528/1413715605588387/?comment_id=1413718378921443&notif_t=event_mall_comment

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kenFyPlESY

Q: What is a death eater?

A: A member of a sociopathic society where the societal norms or culture are driven by sadism or sexual sadism disorder. The agony of others is not a side effect of their actions but a goal. Death eaters are distinct from those with an individual personality disorder in that their society’s norms, structure and actions are all constructed to feed and support their sadism.

Q: What is the difference between a pedosadist and the sexual orientation of pedophilia?

A: There is no such thing as a sexual orientation called paedophilia. A sexual orientation, or sex, requires consenting partners. It is not sex if some of those involved are called victims, that is rape. Someone attracted to rape has sexual sadism disorder or paraphilic coercive disorder. Someone attracted to the rape of children is a paedosadist. A paedosadist who acts on their impulses is a criminal paedosadist, one who does not is a non-offending paedosadist.

Q: What is the difference between paedosadist and pedosadist?

A: Paedosadist is the UK spelling, pedosadist is US.

Q: Is OpDeathEaters going after paedosadists on the deep dark web?

A: No, the media made that up because they didn’t want to say we were going after paedosadists in parliament and other powerful institutions. But if we get rid of the ones in institutions of power, we are confident we can get rid of those on the web as well, deep or no.

Q: How do I report paedosadist imagery on the Internet?

A: Talk to our comrades at @ReportaPed0 and #OpPedoHunt. #OpDeathEaters focuses on high level complicity, obstruction of justice, cover ups, and child trafficking.

Q: Where do I donate to #OpDeathEaters?

A: OpDeathEaters is a global idea and the duty of all adults. Do not ever donate to anyone claiming to be #OpDeathEaters.

Q: Is OpDeathEaters calling for vigilante justice?

A: No. #OpDeathEaters is calling for legally binding inquiries and, if necessary, tribunals.

Q: Which inquiry does #OpDeathEaters support?

A: It is not #OpDeathEaters business to choose or support one inquiry over another. We support the right of the people to choose an inquiry format and panel which they can trust.

Q: When will Anonymous be finished setting up inquiries?

A: #OpDeathEaters is for all adults, not just Anonymous. To get support for inquiries we need easily presented facts and the best case(s) which need to be (re)opened and we need discussion forums on reddit, facebook, google+, instagram, Pinterest, tumblr, blogs, community halls, news media, everywhere. We need to have a global network of people committed enough to do the research and build community suppport in each region. We can then spread that information as widely as possible and organize inquiries. There will be no inquiries of any kind without massive public support. 

Q: Is Anonymous going to hack and find evidence of high level paedosadists?

A: There is no need for anyone associated with #opDeathEaters to ever hack a site or view illegal images. All of the evidence we need to establish a need for inquiries is publicly available. In the UK, even attempting to call up an illegal image is called ‘creating’ a child abuse image and is a crime. Don’t do itHacked evidence is inadmissible in court and you could mess up a real investigation. Don’t do that either.

Q: But the media told me all Anonymous were hackers?

A: Not really. The only hacking we are doing this time is writing code. That’s not illegal yet.

Q: What if someone on the #OpDeathEaters tag told me to hack or download child abuse?

A: Block them and report them to twitter for abuse and tell others to do the same.

Q: I did support #OpDeathEaters but someone on the tag said something I disagree with.

A: We do not control Twitter. We are only responsible for the information we collect for the database.

Q: No one is the boss of Anonymous. You can’t decide what OpDeathEaters is.

A: No one can tell Anonymous what to do and everyone is free to help an op or not as they choose. But if they disagree with the core objectives of the op (as written here) they may be Anonymous but they aren’t part of OpDeathEaters. That’s how it works.

Q: How do I give testimony to #opDeathEaters?

A: At this tme, OpDeathEaters has no way of ensuring your safety, providing emotional support or ensuring your information will be acted on. Fight for a legally recognized, independent, victim-led inquiry which can provide a safe place for victim and witness testimony.

Q: But I have really important information and I want to tell you anyway?

A: Make 3 copies of it and pass it as either encrypted files or in person to people you trust will get it to the right place when it is safe to do so. Also, see if you can find a reporter who understands source protection to publish your information. If your information is legally actionable, try taking it to a lawyer and seeking justice. If that is not an option, at least try to present your information in legally actionable affidavit format when passing it to others. The database will eventually allow secure affidavit uploading, not for public viewing but to be collected by human rights law firms or inquiries. Talk to Heather Marsh (@GeorgieBC) after the database is live if you are a human rights lawyer and wish to help with that. The database may eventually be used to upload affidavits to inquiries after they are established.

Q: Where is the database?

A: Follow @OperationDB for updates

on Github https://github.com/OperationDB/Gaetana

on Tumblr http://operationdb.tumblr.com/ 

Q: Why do we need a database?

A: We need to change the way we do journalism so we can better understand the context, history and dependencies of these networks. Background:

News, analysis, action https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2013/11/02/news-analysis-action/

Good-bye Wikipedia, hello something else https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2013/10/21/good-bye-wikipedia-hello-something-else/ 

Our right to communicate https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/our-right-to-communicate/ 

2010: Why we didn’t know our ruling classes were paedosadists. https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2010/11/22/the-new-social-register/

Q: What kind of data will opDeathEaters collect?

A: We are looking for primary source, court documents and mainstream media reports. Using mainstream media and above sources is legal protection against false accusation and libel. As @der_bluthund points out, we can use blogs if they are by a recognized expert such as a lawyer, social worker, police or similar. Our first objective is to create a database which will track the influence networks around known cases.http://www.hundhaus.uk/2015/01/opdeatheaters-research-101/ 

When the database is operative we will work with human rights law firms (or hopefully established independent inquiries) to allow victim testimony in affidavit format to be submitted confidentially to those legally empowered to act on it. We have two primary obstacles for those seeking justice: the powerful support and perceived credibility of the accused and the frequently very vulnerable positions of the accusers. Many former victims are drug addicts as they were fed drugs by their abusers from a very young age. Many have mental health issues and are in institutions of one kind or another. Those in refugee camps or otherwise dependent have no voice to the outside. They are very vulnerable to being silenced. In order to have true equality under the law, we have to both remove (and prosecute) the support networks covering for the accused and proactively protect and seek testimony from the vulnerable. It is not enough to simply ask that they come forward when many are in no position to do so.

Q: Will the database just be looking at child rapists?

A: No. It is impossible to separate child rapists from those using children for ritual killings, organ harvesting, militias, slaves, drugs and weapons trafficking mules and more. We are also not looking at just those participating directly in paedosadism, we are looking at the influence networks of obstruction of justice and potential blackmail upholding them.

Q: Why are people mentioning the Clintons when he has not been accused of paedosadism?

A: The US Attorney General’s instruction to the US Justice Department was to “pursue justice without making a political mess”. The connection between Epstein and the Clintons, among others, could be seen as a possible factor in Epstein serving only 13 months of ‘house arrest’ (which included regular flights to the US virgin islands and NY) for criminal activity which would usually have resulted in a far stronger sentence. That relationship could then be considered a reason the case should have gone to an independent, victim-led tribunal protected by transparency and public support.

Q: What about Prince Andrew? Sex with a 17 year old wasn’t even illegal in the jurisdictions it occurred?

A: We are interested in Prince Andrew for potential blackmail, obstruction of justice and influence peddling in criminal networks. He has also been accused of participating in an underaged sex orgy.

Q: Is this just a UK / US op?

A: Phase one was @opGabon. This is a problem in every state and international organization of any size. 

Q: Aren’t there NGOs fighting this?

A: We have found infilteration of NGOs, HelpLines, police, and every type of organization set up ostensibly to aid victims. A high level mafia will always co-opt any organization their victims will run to.

Q: Why don’t you leave it to international organizations like the United Nations and Interpol?

A: There have been high level complicity and cover-ups there too.

Q: Is it just the Catholic church?

A: We have evidence from every major religious group. Where there is power, secrecy and impunity, there is paedosadism.

Q: So is it the Masons? Or the Illuminati?

A: Whatever the origins, this is a problem that not only spans the globe but also is throughout every layer of society and can no longer be pinned to one group or reason. It is like metastasized cancer at this point.

Q: Why are you going after the top?

A: This is an industry. Going after the consumers while leaving those who create and enable the industry and the advertising for the industry intact will never work. Many paedsosadists are former victims and, as in the drug industry, the current laws have served as a means to blackmail victims and witnesses who may otherwise have gone to the police.

Q: What about WeProtect? Aren’t they doing the same thing?

A: WeProtect is an Internet censorship campaign aimed at blocking search results into paedosadism so the public will never be able to research a project such as opDeathEaters again. It also promises to arrest a lot of low level people (like victims and witnesses) and fill the prisons, but the same government is still blocking an inquiry into high level complicity in paedosadism. #WeProtect is the top planning to arrest the bottom. #OpDeathEaters is the bottom planning to arrest the top. 

Q: What should we do about this? Should we kill all pedosadists or put them in jail or what?

A: We created the paedosadism industry, we can dismantle it.

Free will and seductive coercion https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/04/22/free-will-and-seductive-coercion/

A mythical Manichean world https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/11/19/a-mythical-manichean-world/

How we came to be ruled by Death Eaters https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/12/05/how-we-came-to-be-ruled-by-death-eaters/

The other Battle for the Internet https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/11/08/the-other-battle-for-the-internet/

Q: When did #OpDeathEaters start?

A: This phase of OpDeathEaters started in November, 2014 but the first phase was @OpGabon in early 2013 and there are overlaps with @opRohingya and @opKachin as well.

Q: Who is leading #opDeathEaters?

A: No one. #OpDeathEaters is idea driven https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2012/12/01/idea-and-action-driven-systems/ stigmergic action ( https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2012/12/24/stigmergy-2/We are all aiming for the same objective but how you help us get there is your choice (which doesn’t mean you won’t get negative feedback if others don’t agree with your choice).

Q: Ok, but whose idea was #opDeathEaters?

A: Heather Marsh (@georgiebc).

#OpDeatheaters historical background:

How we came to be ruled by Death Eaters: https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/12/05/how-we-came-to-be-ruled-by-death-eaters/

Sociopaths, Psychopaths and Death Eaters: https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/11/23/sociopaths-psychopaths-and-death-eaters/

The other Battle for the Internet: https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/11/08/the-other-battle-for-the-internet/

Installing new governance: https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/11/12/installing-new-governance/

Witches and how they are silenced: https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/05/01/witches-and-how-they-are-silenced/

2012: Internet and paedosadists (at 11:40):

http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/fivelive/pods/pods_20120221-0400a.mp3

2013: Internet and paedosadists again (at 45.)

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/envision-this/2014/01/06/political-theorist-and-internet-activistheather-marsh

2014: Internet and paedosadists again (pp 8-9)

http://www.lavaca.org/mu/mu-83-podemos/

Q: Are there main accounts I should follow?

A:Twitter: @opDeathEaters, @GeorgieBC, @YourAnonCentral and this 

List: https://twitter.com/OpDeathEaters/lists/opdeatheaters

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCklWsaKX-cvapEC5KRGU0hw

Tumblr: http://youranoncentral.tumblr.com/

Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1522133861392796/

Q: I want #opDeathEaters to be a big success in my country but the official Anonymous OpDeathEaters account for my state isn’t doing much.

A: There are no official accounts. Start another. Most accounts start with @opDeathEaters or @opDE so we can find them easily. They are for focused research and organizing. They can be formed for specific regions, NGO’s, UN, militaries, churches, corporations, wherever your interest lies.

Q: I’m not good at research or organizing so I am just retweeting and tweeting old tweets all day long. It’s getting boring.

A: Please spread that information to Facebook, reddit, Instagram, Google+, Tumblr, everywhere else you can think of.

Q: I’ve been working on #opDeathEaters and a journalist wants to talk to me. What should I say?

A: Refer them to the FAQ and then answer their questions. As long as no one contradicts the FAQ, anyone can talk about their experiences working on the op.

Q: A lot of the words I am hearing are new to me and they aren’t the same as I hear on the news.

A: This may help…

1. Glossary: https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/category/glossary/

2. New Orwellian Dictionary: https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/category/new-orwellian-dictionary-nod/

Q: Why use the term “death eaters”? The people you are describing are the utmost depraved perverts on the planet but to get all of this into the heads of the mainstream majority, I just think we need to use more familiar and simpler terms to describe these psycho’s and their evil actions.

A: We really don’t have a term to describe these people. That has been used to block this story for years, as soon as anyone mentions the topic their listeners demand to know who the group is and the conversation descends into ‘the Illuminati’ or ‘the Masons’ or ‘the Satanists’. There are depraved perverts at all levels of society, we are not talking about all of them (and neither of those words suit our meaning in any case). Also, there are people who are very much part of death eaters society who are not paedosadists or even involved in trafficking, they just live within, enable and protect the society and allow it to exist. So a choice, invent a completely new gobbledegook word or use one which everyone understands and is also a completely accurate term for what we mean. Anything less would be rationalizing, normalizing and completely false terminology like ‘paedophile’, comforting to the listeners and allowing them to settle back into slumber in famliar surroundings. We have seen this in the lies presenting child torture and murder around the world as ‘war’, ‘national security’, ‘policing’, etc., and the word ‘paedophile’ had already almost fully buried this story in the UK. This is really our last chance to NOT use familiar and simple terms and confront the fact that we are in fact ruled by death eaters.

Who controls the words controls your thoughts.

Q: How can you guarantee I won’t be arrested or harmed if I fight for the arrest of a powerful mafia?

A: We can’t. Adults assess the level of potential risk they are willing to take to keep children safe from real torture. It is the job of children to reach adulthood, it is the job of adults to do something with their adult lives. The only guarantee in life is death. Your only choice is what you do in the interim.

Q: Oh. Well, any tips at least?

A: The only security will come from society. We need numbers and speed and we need to remove power from sociopaths. Those most in need of protection are in jails and mental institutions and their testimony needs to be heard urgently. We will not bring a powerful sociopathic mafia to justice through encrypted email. Burkina Faso burned their parliament buildings and made at least a portion of their oligarchy flee the country in three days and they did not do it through online security, they used irl action. This mafia is not afraid of encryption (which they wrote) they are afraid of people speaking out loud.

Q: I just want to feel a little secure online? >_<

A: Oh all right, if you want online security tips ask @SamuraiLucy.

Q: Ok. I agree with #opDeathEaters but there are a lot of people talking to me who just want a few little things changed to make it more reasonable. They think it would help us achieve our goals if we made some slight modifications to the objective and used words these people are more comfortable with and appealed to a more mainstream audience and got some celebrities to endorse us and formed an NGO and collected funding and distanced ourselves from all the controversial people behind this op. They tell me that I am very reasonable and if only I distanced myself from these controversial aspects and people I could be a CEO of the new OpDeathEaters NGO and probably have a career in politics and really make a difference.

A: Please read: 

How corporations defeat grassroots movements: (Thank you Jeremy Hammond.) popularresistance.org/heres-how-the-corporations-defeat-political-movements/ 

Concern troll: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/concern_troll

Bikeshedding: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bikeshedding

In particular note from first link:

Activist subtypes: “radicals, idealists, realists and opportunists.”

Radical activists “want to change the system; have underlying socio/political motives’ and see multinational corporations as ‘inherently evil’, do not trust the … federal, state and local governments to protect them and to safeguard the environment. They believe, rather, that individuals and local groups should have direct power over industry … I would categorize their principal aims … as social justice and political empowerment.”

The “idealist” is easier to deal with.

“Idealists…want a perfect world…Because of their intrinsic altruism, however, … [they] have a vulnerable point,” he told the audience. “If they can be shown that their position is in opposition to an industry … and cannot be ethically justified, they [will] change their position.”

The two easiest subtypes to join the corporate side of the fight are the “realists” and the “opportunists.” By definition, an “opportunist” takes the opportunity to side with the powerful for career gain and has skin in the game for “visibility, power [and] followers.”

The realist, by contrast, is more complex but the most important piece of the puzzle, says Duchin.

“[Realists are able to] live with trade-offs; willing to work within the system; not interested in radical change; pragmatic. The realists should always receive the highest priority in any strategy dealing with a public policy issue.”

Duchin outlined a corresponding three-step strategy to “deal with” these four activist subtypes. First, isolate the radicals. Second, “cultivate” the idealists and “educate” them into becoming realists. And finally, co-opt the realists.

“If your industry can successfully bring about these relationships, the credibility of the radicals will be lost and opportunists can be counted on to share in the final policy solution.”

Q: Well, I can’t help being taken in by feds. I am just too trusting, I am such an honest and caring person myself I could never understand how others could be dishonest. I just like to believe the best about people, I’m not a cynic or a pessimist like others. It’s just not in my nature to not talk to these people and attempt to bring them in and reach a compromise because I am a kind and loving person and I just can’t be rude when they are being so kind to me.

A: You are an unprincipled, weak-willed narcissist. You cannot resist flattery and you are not-so-secretly jealous of those with stronger principles than you and you wish to feel superior by presenting derailment as ‘reasonable’. You are helping derail the objective and the movement and you can’t sit with us.

Q: Ok, I don’t want to be taken in by feds but I see the UK army just added 1500 troops to conduct a propaganda war on Facebook and Twitter along with all the other government socks that were already there. How will I know who these people are?

A: By their techniques. They aim to co-opt, divide and divert. If an idea is anonymous, they will prop up media friendly poppets to claim the idea as their own and divert followers to worthless or harmful objectives (see Sabu or Occupy). With an idea such as OpDeathEaters they would dismiss it as a product of the sensational, poorly researched sites that previously enabled the topic to be dismissed as lunacy. If an idea had an origin, they will discredit the origin. (‘Turing believes machines think. Turing lies with men. Therefore, machines don’t think.’) If an idea has an origin that nothing is known about, that will be portrayed as untrustworthy. If the origin is a well known personality then everything they have ever done will be attacked and they will be portrayed as a ‘narcissist’ and ‘personality cult’ for being well known. Any known person involved at any level will be used as an excuse to divide (‘I love what you are doing but I can’t work on anything X is involved in.’)

The solution is to ignore personalities and block anyone who tries to derail into discussion of personalities. OpDeathEaters is idea driven, stigmergic action, our focus is on the objective and data.

Q: If we just focus on the objective they can’t stop us?

A: Of course they can try. They can redefine the meaning of the objective or each of the words in it and attack each word separately. They can do everything possible to intimidate witnesses, victims, investigators and everyone else involved. They can co-opt panels. They can even flee to other countries and fake their own deaths as the nazis did before Nuremberg. They are currently doing every one of those things, but we have the momentum and they are crumbling.

Q: In the meantime, these trolls on the tag and in my timeline are driving me crazy. What do I say to them?

A: Nothing. They have elite, specialized training in how to drive you crazy. If everyone on the tag uses the block button they can’t do their jobs, they are paid to engage you. Do not engage with intelligence agents trained to divert you. 

– 

Q: Who wrote all this crap and who did they go to for authority?

A: Heather Marsh (@georgiebc) and she went to herself.

If you have any further questions feel free to ask any of our main accounts, thank you. Please translate and share the FAQ widely, Hashtag: #OpDeathEaters

Warning: This is not #OpDeathEaters

Normally I would just paste this, but for anyone looking on this blog for #opDeathEaters information, I am putting it here too.

A few days ago I received a message asking me to follow an account @JustDriveMovie on Twitter, which I did. I then received dm’s from them as follows. As far as I am concerned any communication I received from them was meant for anyone involved in Anonymous or OpDeathEaters since that is the only reason they were contacting me. It is completely in the interest of all people they wish to represent to see how they are to be represented. Since this company said “Confidence that the network will have our backs is essential.” early feedback is of course an advantage for them as well. This is my sole communication with these people.

Them: Thank you. I lk forward to communicating w/you and proving to you that I am who and what I say I am. Values and Principles are my soul.

A man is only willing to bend over backwards so many times before he realizes he wasn’t performing for a potential ally. Its time to take me Seriously.

Me: I said I would talk to you today. My schedule is not yours to order and threats don’t go over well. Explain what you want.

Them: Actually we said we would talk THURSDAY, don’t expect to “control” your schedule, just do as each other says, especially when building trust

Your schedule is no more busy than mine and I’m still reaching out to YOU to use my art, business and life as a vehicle for you, sooo

How about we move past the part where you assume I’m some kid playing games and we have a serious discussion about how I can help. 

And its hard to reference your schedule when you post a thousands tweets a day for the cause, but can’t respond to someone willing to

Take on your war in a major way.

Me: This is a response. Still waiting for you to explain what you want.

Them: Fyi Respect goes both ways. I believe what i OFFER has been explained to you by several people. I was told you were the person to have a

Serious conversation with about how we can HELP EACH OTHER, advance the cause with enlightenment through entertainment.

If you hv a lot of filmmakers lining up to risk their career catering a script & platform to YOUR agenda,

then sorry for wasting your tweeting time.

Me: I have had one mutual acquaintance ask me to follow you. I know nothing else about you. Serious conversations involve information.

Them: I find that hard to believe considering the public tweets we’ve both been tagged with and ___ told me he sent you my email and talked to you

Several times about what we are willing to do and how we would try and work in as much pertinent details as possible.

I’m willing to use my career/film to be the mainstream vehicle that forces press to broach/discuss the cause. Maybe you and ___should get on

Same page before we go any farther. I’m the one offering the two of you something you simply do not have on your side.

– – –

So, I put this in the spam folder of my mind where so many such communications a day go, but then I received an email explaining further what their objective was and apparently this is a real person so I think it needs to be clarified just how far I stand from this initiative.

OpDeathEaters is a global idea and the duty of all adults. For decades (centuries?) untold numbers of investigators, reporters, victims, witnesses and concerned people have died while trying to expose elite paedosadist and trafficking rings. Right now, untold numbers are risking their safety trying to expose this story. We have responsible adults working worldwide as researchers, investigators, coders, and every other manner of assistance. The work they are doing is exceptional.

Anyone who has never worked on this subject before, takes no risk, wants all promotion and research done for them and also thinks their efforts should benefit from a crowd sourced fundraising campaign is a special kind of arrogant. Add to that these people want to be the “face and voice for the message” (and any new Anonymous operation) and the proposed movie has absolutely nothing to do with real victims or the real campaign and appears to be the worst kind of Great Hero Hollywood tripe, posing as reality, mixed in with conspiracy theory. It would completely destroy the credibility of OpDeathEaters, as well as completely co-opt any media around it. So I thought you should know.

Ed: Worth reading this whole thread from @OpDeathEaters

Email with ID removed.

I apologize for the delay. While preparing to write this I found myself
quite inspired with strong ideas about how to integrate #OpDeathEaters
in to a story that was always meant to serve this type of cause. Before
I get into all the surrounding aspects of our ‘Social Filmmaking’
plan, how I see cohesion in agendas and the concerns I have going in,
let me start with the story. I attached the current version of the
script.

STORY

The basic storyline is a disenfranchised superstar (think Russell Brand
and his Trews attitude meets George Clooney’s level of influence)
figures out on the way to an appearance that the event has been hijacked
by a nefarious political force specifically to give the public
appearance that our superstar ‘Tony DeFranco’ endorses their agenda.
The entire film takes place in a limousine on the way to the event and
ends in a high speed chase that culminates with Tony’s publicist
offering him an ultimate that includes playing ball and exiting the limo
alive, or dying in a horrible crash in a limo full of drugs and dead
hookers. As the story unfolds the audience discovers that Tony is the
primary financier of ‘Anonymous Operations’ and he has been
orchestrating an underground war against the global elite right under
their nose from the heart of Hollywood.

I always intended for Tony’s motivations to be more focused and
meaningful, so framing his motivations around a major Anonymous
Operation like #OpDeathEaters is something I fully support as the writer
and an activist.

I immediately wrote up an outline for changes to the script that could
dramatically involve key details such as already convicted names, direct
references and a central conflict/plot that revolve around the
Operation. In a general sense it could look like this, Tony’s
Hollywood existence gave him first hand access to this cabal of
pedophilia. It was he who originally ordered #OpDeathEaters. He who has
been financing and supplying insider information to the operation. The
nefarious politician who hijacks his event for their presidential bid,
is one of the key ring leaders, the most untouchable, for the cabal and
Tony’s antithesis. After Tony picks up a sexy stranger on the way to
the event and debates the moral dilemma of going or not going to the
event, she convinces him that “you can only remain anonymous for so
long, before you must lead by example.” He decides that tonight will
be “the night the mask comes off”. When his traitorous, soulless
publicist gets wind of his intent, she blackmails the young driver to
take Tony on a high speed police chase where she forces the devils
ultimatum on him. In the end he chooses to be a martyr for the cause. It
leaks out that he drew a triangle into the coke dust before he died and
his death becomes a massive conspiracy theory, portrayed in the
mainstream media as the nefarious politicians example/platform for why
“everyone will be held accountable”. (This is just a sweeping
generalization, but with hard specifics from your side I can definitely
weave hard facts and truths into the story without skipping a beat and
in fact making the story much deeper and more powerful.)

PRODUCTION

When it comes to production, I have a small, but elite team of studio
caliber professionals who are all personal friends. We designed this as
a contained thriller that we could use to show off our talents as a team
and claim our career independence from the system. (For exactly these
kinds of creative freedoms) The film was designed to be shot in just 15
days on a single sound stage. We had intended on shooting it at the
Youtube studios, but we must partner with a channel that has over 100k
subscribers already. Any chance you’re connected to the anonymous
youtube channel? Could be a platform to directly release the film on as
well. Some of the linked documents below discuss the business/technical
aspects of the film in greater detail. Rest assured we expect the
quality of this film to be a stunning leap in what indie filmmaking is
capable of. It will have the production quality and heart to win
Sundance.

DOCUMENTARY

At the same time all of this is happening, we just started shooting
initial interviews, and as part of the secondary surrounding content, we
are shooting a documentary following our efforts to make this movie.
That documentary could easily be expanded to be a documentary about the
use of fiction as a vehicle for a delivering a horrifying truth to the
population in an un-ignorable way. IE the Hannibal Burris/Bill Cosby
moment of reckoning on a massive scale. In addition, by documenting
everything and sharing most of it in real time it offers a built in
layer of protection from anyone who would mean us harm. Any
harm/harrassment to us would only reinforce the truth of what they are,
and make this whole story an un-ignorable headline around the world.

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Our surrounding plan for the film is very detailed and extensive. It
provides countless live and social platforms that combined with the
right network could ensure that #OpDeathEaters is a constant trending
topic. The linked documents explain our plans in more detail, but the
general plan is this… Through live events, viral, reality and
transmedia storytelling we intend to document and share the entire
process of making our movie as we make it. All of this secondary content
will be part of our viral marketing campaign for the film and will be
used to hold ourselves accountable to the crowd. Because we will be
asking the community to support this film, we have made a commitment to
use the film as a platform to give back to the community. There is no
limitation on how we do this, but this is what we have planned so far…

LAUNCH – In the Spring of 2015 we intend to host a celebrity charity
poker tournament for Big Brother Big Sister. This event will be
co-hosted with Aces & Angels the charity poker organization to the
stars. This event will be a high profile live streamed event on Youtube
– The Anonymous Youtube Channel perhaps? This event will serve as the
back drop for an interactive web-a-thon promoting the start of our
national crowd fund campaign. The web-a-thon will feature a level of
audience guest interaction never before experienced with rewards to
match. 50% of the money raised will go to BBBS and 50% will go to us to
cover the costs of the event. As part of our agreement with Aces and
Angels the event projects no less than $100,000 raised with an
expectation of $250,000.

Another part of our charitable commitments will be a 10% pledge of every
crowd fund donation to a national charity/cause (TBD) when the campaign
ends. The 90% that goes to fund the project will be promised as a
donation by the film once it is released.

PRODUCTION – In order to restore the trust and value back into crowd
funding the key to our entire business model is shooting the film while
the campaign is actually happening. This way through our documenting and
sharing, the audience can watch the film come together, meet the people
involved, watch the hard work and passion before they even consider
donating to the project. During production there would be a live
streamed nightly wrap up show from set where a host interviews members
of the production, this would be another great nightly platform to
remind people why we are doing this.

DISTRIBUTION – While we have traditional distribution contacts, those
would only be necessary for foreign sales. For domestic everything would
be interactive and cause oriented. With our model we have the freedom to
release the film in all traditional formats as well as new media formats
such as any youtube channel, theater or alternative platform we choose.
For us this means making sure the film releases everywhere at the same
time.

We have arranged a theatrical release that goes outside the studio
system and is sustained only as long as the demand, without any upfront
costs. The CEO of Tugg.com [1] has promised us a minimum of 200 theater
screenings for our release night. Tickets for these screenings will be
available from the first day the movie goes into production. Through
Tugg additional local screenings can be easily requested by fans or
event promoters and include affiliate fees for events that sell out.

On top of that, with a platform called distrify.com we can offer a
youtube like video that serves as a trailer/store/vod platform that can
be updated from the back end. That means any online press the cause or
film gets along the way can embed a youtube like video player in their
article that offers fresh content, promos, videos, products and the
movie once it is released. It also has a built in affiliates commission.
If you and/or us need to issue an important call to arms video, it would
instantly populate in any past article, press, blog or website that
shared or embedded the player. This has a built in 15% affiliate
commission for anyone who shares or embeds the player/store so get
creates a tangible reason for positive coverage.

THE CHERRY – The final piece of our social filmmaking model includes a
30 day bus tour leading up to the release of the movie. The tour would
serve as a rolling reality show and include 20 free charity screenings
around the country, the filmmakers would host Q&A’s after each show
talking about the film and presumably the Operation and any new
operation. We could be a face and voice for the message that people can
interact and feel comfortable with, while still deferring to the
collective. The nuts and bolts of this plan are all designed to turn the
movies release night (which will be scheduled and promoted before the
launch event) into the pop culture event of the year. This is all before
we add the power of Anonymous into the equation.

FINANCIALS

Because much of this model centers around personal relationships, we can
produce, market and distribute the film for less than $350,000. But, the
beauty of the business model is that with a large enough social network
(This is where Anonymous comes in) the model is designed to be self
sufficient after the initial costs of the charity event have been
acquired. Once we come up with $30,000 to cover the event deposits, we
have a proven sponsorship coordinator, the BBBS donor list and Aces and
Angels ready to maximize the event revenue.

The crowd fund campaign, web-a-thon, presales, secondary content, tour
sponsorships, online ad revenue (from all viral traffic) will cover the
costs of production and the tour. Our detailed financial projections
show us reaching profitability before we wrap production on the film.

Thanks to our financial sponsorship through ‘From The Heart
Productions’ any donation to the project is eligible for a tax
deduction.

TIMELINE

Every aspect of this plan is designed to be a tight ascending line of
momentum that builds off each stage before it. This means no long turn
around, we create a wave and ride it to the release night.

STARTING POINT – The moment we can secure 30k (seed money) to pay the
deposit on Aces & Angels, the venue and essential labor.

LAUNCH EVENT – Schedule 90 days after seed money. This is lead up, viral
marketing, event promotions.

PRODUCTION/CROWDFUND CAMPAIGN – 15 days during the 45 day campaign.
(Endless amount of secondary content produced)

POST PRODUCTION/TOUR PROMOTIONS – 90 days – The film will be shot in
chronological order to allow editing and reshoots to happen as we go.

CROSS COUNTRY TOUR – 30 days

WORLDWIDE RELEASE – 240 Days. (Unheard of by traditional industry
standards)

MARKETING ANGLES, VIRAL CONTENT, COHESIVE AGENDA

– The title of our charity event is ‘All In For Kids’ so adding a
deeper, more important subtext/purpose to that title works perfectly.

– As long as we do not feel like we are painting a bullseye on our chest
and then being escorted out into a field, we are happy to use our
platform, business model, film and content as a vehicle for the greater
good. The truth is the sole reason I ever saught to exploit my ability
to entertain was to accumulate the relationships and the resources to
fight these wars, so if I have the opportunity to skip the long game and
get back the ten years of my life I wasted with no direction, I am so
down for the cause.

Together we could easily turn this into a 9 month straight barrage of
attention/press/media/discussions on #OpDeathEaters culminating in crowd
sourced theatrical release that could double as a public demonstration
of the full power of Anonymous. Through pop culture we can create a
moment that insists that anyone in power who is not with them, turn on
them.

– I know for a fact the union of our resources would create an
inevitable media firestorm. We’ve accumulated quite a few press and
industry people who are secret supporters of our social filmmaking model
and laying in wait to join a groundswell. When you combine the
disruption to the traditional industry we already represent, with the
reach of anonymous, it will be like catnip to social journalists
everywhere.

I can already see the spin – band of Hollywood rebels risk industry
banishment working with Anonymous to make a powerful film dedicated to
exposing Hollywood Mogul Monsters. Especially if we go with a marketing
campaign that…

– Implies we made this movie (even changed the script) based on a
supposed real superstars first hand account. We can say that we were
already planning on making a movie about a Hollywood A-Lister who is
secretly a member of Anonymous. From that we connected with a member of
Anonymous who has been in communication with a very high-level member of
the Hollywood food chain for sometime regarding #OpDeathEater. From this
unidentified whistleblowers communications relayed to Gratwick Films, we
rewrote our script to be a “fictional” story based on this secret
A-listers secret confessions.

– Video Collaboration, blurring the lines between fiction and reality
would sell it. If both sides are 100% willing to go to the wall with
this, we can collaborate on a series of videos that imply we have a big
time Hollywood WhistleBlower who gave us first hand accounts of their
secret war with the powerful scum of Hollywood. We can take from the
documents and information your ally has and “leak” details out in
those videos. If done and presented right, the “Tony DeFranco”
character would be a pseudonym for the alleged whistleblower. It could
get the real scumbags shaking in their boots about how close to home
this movie is going to go and if someone really did talk to us. The goal
would be to turn a mantra like “Who Is Tony DeFranco?” into a call
to action with endless layers of subtext in the likes of “Who Is John
Gault?” It would be code for anyone fighting to expose these scum, it
would create speculation about who the REAL Tony DeFranco actually is,
maybe it will inspire a Hollywood elite to personify Tony and step
forward. The advantages are endless.

OUR CONCERNS

– 1 is being hung out to dry. For us, once an alignment/commitment like
this is made, we are not publicly anonymous, there is no going back. So
much more than the threat of harm, my greatest concern is taking a giant
social trust fall and not having anonymous people there to blow some
wind under our wings.

– 2 this caliber of alliance will certainly strain some of our
unfortunately necessary business relationships. Such as enticing event
sponsors, celebrity guests, charity partnerships. This could suffocate
the modest financial streams we are counting on to run a professional
crowd fund campaign. Confidence that the network will have our backs is
essential. To be completely honest, we have already sacrificed so much
for the greater good, everything we have and the roof over our tiny
apartment is riding on getting this project off the ground in the next
30 days, so adding a degree of difficulty to securing those precious
initial funds could be a back breaker.

All this being said I’m down for doing whatever is necessary on my end
to make this happen.

Please view the documents below as supporting information,

Looking to do some good before I go,

Kris

THE SCRIPT – http://pastebin.com/SJDZEBt8

LOOK BOOK – Visual presentation of what the film will look like.

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B478ynfqma6gSDNvYUVZWWhUTDg/edit?usp=docslist_api
[2]

PITCH DECK – A basic overview of the films essential details. Some
casting info is outdated.

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B478ynfqma6geH
[3]pzNVV5UFNHYW8/edit?usp=docslist_api [4]

REVENUE STAGES

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B478ynfqma6gT21pemtzWjZuRkk/edit?usp=docslist_api
[5]

DP BIO

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B478ynfqma6gb3VVRkJsNXZva00/edit?usp=docslist_api
[6]

SHORT TERM INVESTMENT PROPOSAL

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B478ynfqma6gOUlvRnJ5V1hxNVk/edit?usp=docslist_api
[7]

ALL IN FOR KIDS SPONSOR DECK – EXAMPLE

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B478ynfqma6gRjZqeG5BRUJQdWc/edit?usp=docslist_ap
[8]i

SOCIAL FILMMAKING CONTENT & TIMELINE

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B478ynfqma6gamN2eWVpRlVnSUE/edit?usp=docslist_api
[9]

ACES AND ANGELS – PARTNER FOR CHARITY EVENT

http://www.aces-angels.com/ [10]

FROM THE HEART PRODUCTIONS – ACCEPTED JUST DRIVE FOR FINANCIAL
SPONSORSHIP

http://fromtheheartproductions.com/ [11]

Links:
——
[1] http://tugg.com/
[2] https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B478ynfqma6gSDNvYUVZWWhUTDg/edit?usp=docslist_api
[3] https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B478ynfqma6geH
[4] https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B478ynfqma6geHpzNVV5UFNHYW8/edit?usp=docslist_api
[5] https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B478ynfqma6gT21pemtzWjZuRkk/edit?usp=docslist_api
[6] https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B478ynfqma6gb3VVRkJsNXZva00/edit?usp=docslist_api
[7] https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B478ynfqma6gOUlvRnJ5V1hxNVk/edit?usp=docslist_api
[8] https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B478ynfqma6gRjZqeG5BRUJQdWc/edit?usp=docslist_api
[9] https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B478ynfqma6gamN2eWVpRlVnSUE/edit?usp=docslist_api
[10] http://www.aces-angels.com/
[11] http://fromtheheartproductions.com/

Anonymous Whistleblower Shares Cryptic Warning to Hollywood:

How we came to be ruled by Death Eaters

There are two primary methods of coercion used to enforce societal norms. The most visible is hard coercion, apparent in militias and police as well as courts, prisons, and institutional force of all kinds. The far more powerful form, without which the hard coercion would not be tolerated, is seductive coercion.

Seductive coercion comes in two forms. The first is used to create society and involves social acceptance and approval as motivators. This form of seductive coercion produces love, loyalty, and other forms of social bonding.

The second form is used to create hate and enmity and to reject another society, go to war against them or persecute them in another way. This form of coercion uses group affiliation, fear, dehumanizing propaganda and dissociation.

There are well known, although poorly understood, hormonal responses which help build both hate and love. Both are intense responses to others which are dependent on some shared experience, even if only through propaganda. Often the most intense hate is produced in the same populations which formerly experienced the most intense love, such as in civil wars or familial breakups. 

Both hate and love and the lesser emotions around them are measures of social approval. In the past, all societies used an approval economy to measure acceptance or shunning of each other. Acceptance was not simply an emotional boost, it was inclusion into the social circle which allowed access to essentials of life such as shared food, shelter and procreation. Rejection by shunning was very frequently a death sentence or at least condemnation to an extremely difficult, stressful and shortened life. At best it would mean starting all over again by trying to gain acceptance into a new society.

Dissociation

In order to create the dissociated ponzi schemes of power currently governing society, human relationships had to be replaced with the trade economy. Trade economy replaced societal approval with approval based on each person’s ability to be of service to the powerful. The trade economy eventually interrupted almost all social relationships and replaced them with industry. Social approval was replaced with currency to the point that a person’s worth is now commonly given as a currency value. Currency is a powerful seductive tool because it allows acceptance into the most privileged spots of all societies with no effort required to gain social approval or accept the norms and values of the society.

In those cultures where women and children had autonomy, patriarchy had to be instilled at the family level as the essential building block to patriarchal governance. As the trade economy created waged labour only for those who were serving the wealthy and left community and family service unpaid, women were placed at a huge disadvantage under the trade economy and made to rely solely on a father or husband for the currency which had become social approval. The marriage partnership became dissociated and turned into a master-slave or employer-employee relationship instead of one built on mutual social approval. Matriarchal societies were destroyed as the approval or ability to shun which had been the power of the women in those communities was now worthless and whoever possessed currency needed no one’s approval for societal acceptance.

The industrialization of jobs meant that work is no longer a shared and bonding community experience. The commodification of goods and services has taken sharing and giving out of communities. The state run defence militias claims to remove the need for community solidarity and loyalty. NGOs commodified human empathy, state education commodified respect for community history and tribal knowledge, official government and process dissociated community from governing councils. All of these dissociative structures have removed community bonding experiences.

Cultures which do not greet by kissing and hugging, who handshake (the old greeting to show your enemy you held no weapons) or maintain distance with cold body language, are not producing the hormones necessary to create love and empathy for each other. In a dissociated western world where partners and parents spend little time with each other, much less their community, children are raised in physical bubbles and no one except close family and friends are supposed to touch, it is hard to imagine oxytocin and other hormone levels being socially optimal for bonding. Every transaction of approval, even between parent and child, has sometimes been replaced by an exchange of currency instead of a smile, a hug or a reciprocal gesture of approval. Social shyness and waiting for approval to be gifted has been replaced by taking approval as a right, demanded by all who possess currency. Social shyness is also strongly discouraged by the trade economy which rewards aggression and demands.

Although the exact combination of hormones optimal for bonding is still poorly understood, touch and psychological support are known to be essential for oxytocin production and less oxytocin usually results in more aggression and less caring. Patients with autism and psychiatric disorders have been found to improve with increased oxytocin levels. Cultures with common physical contact such as holding hands or maintaining less personal space, which share community jobs and local jokes and stories and are heavy sharing or gifting cultures, have far more bonding opportunities.

Sex, both social and anti-social

Within the next generation I believe that the world’s rulers will discover … the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience. – Aldous Huxley to George Orwell

When waged labour created a class division between men and women, they became rivals and the so-called war of the sexes began or was entrenched. There is a gender divide in coercion, with hard coercion typically considered the power of men due to their physical strength and seductive coercion considered the power of women, both because hard coercion was not usually an option for women and because they were primarily responsible for the care of society during its formative years. There is also a gender divide among sociopaths. Robert Hare estimated seven times more male sociopaths than female and it has been historically easier for male sociopaths to climb to positions of power. There is an even greater predominance of men within sexual sadism disorder which seems to be manifesting in the establishment wide torture and death cults of the UK and elsewhere.

Societies ruled by seductive coercion used talking, councils and shunning, while patriarchy ruled primarily by hard coercion, police, laws and prisons. A patriarchal power structure had to take control of seductive coercion, partly by demonizing and infantilizing women and  and partly by perverting seductive coercion for their own uses. Seductive coercion has increasingly become a powerful tool of the sociopathic oligarchy.

One of the most important tools in both social and anti-social seductive coercion is sex. Sex has been used to bond couples for communal support in child rearing, but it has also been used as a weapon of war throughout history. There are evidently two distinct types of sex, one bonding and social and the other extremely anti-social.

Oxytocin, believed to play a significant role in bonding, is produced by physical closeness such as breastfeeding, everyday physical contact, massage, tantric or Taoist sex, non-orgasmic sex, cuddling, relaxation, mental closeness, social acceptance, approval and emotional support.[1] Oxytocin is also produced by stress and orgasm, and while it will help bond allies, it will also increase hatred and a lack of empathy for those perceived as outside the social group.

Rape has gone from a by-product of war to a deliberate strategy of war, whether by militia commanders in the DR Congo telling their fighters that rape will bring them magic powers or by Israel and their constant sexual war imagery and orders for war rape. It is one thing to look at the supposed motives for rape in destroying the targeted population, but we must also look at what is causing large populations of men to obey orders for mass raping and whether it is also being used as a tool to condition them hormonally to dehumanize, kill and torture their enemy. Is rape being used simply as a tool against the victims, or is it being used more to raise the level of hate in the fighter? It is possible that the DR Congo militia’s idea of rape as a tool of war for obtaining magic powers to beat their enemy is closer than the NGOs who describe it as a simple war crime.

Dopamine, is a very powerful hormone associated with addictive substances such as cocaine, mental illness such as schizophrenia, and the release of a reward hormone on learning or experiencing novel stimuli. Novel sexual experience causes a surge in dopamine, but the experience must keep changing which leads to a search for more and more extreme stimuli. After orgasm, dopamine levels plummet, leading to the addictive endless search for ever increasing levels of dopamine. The pornography that is the most popular is that which produces the dopamine highs and crashes and is therefore addictive. That is also the type which requires ever-increasing stimulation to reach the same dopamine levels and produces no bonding hormones. While sexual sadism disorder has probably been with us forever, child abuse and snuff film industries were almost exclusively created, not born. 

State and corporate control of women’s sexuality was necessary because it was a powerful coercive tool. Misogyny centres around hatred of coercion, particularly suspected but poorly understood female coercion. From the first ruling of the Catholic Church that sex should be for the purposes of procreation only, sex has been changed from the type that releases bonding hormones to the type that more closely resembles anti-social rape. Non-orgasmic sex, once used for birth control and enjoyment, was decreed sinful by the church and male orgasm became the only point to sex. Sexual contact outside male orgasm was frequently eliminated completely, which would hypothetically greatly reduce the amount of bonding hormones produced between a couple. At the same time, breast feeding was also strongly discouraged and hospitals and other institutions removed infants and children from parental care, reducing familial bonding levels still further.

Heavily dopamine producing sex, from brief encounters with sex workers, rape, pornography, and any other form of ‘hate-sex’ continued and increased as the bonding community and family life was removed. Corporate advertising removed sex progressively farther from a form of approval to a product of the trade economy. Military produced games and movies conflated sex with every form of war and violence as did the news media and the military itself. The UK media call torture, murder and dismemberment of children ‘child sex’ and ‘paedophilia’ as does the UK government’s Child Sex Abuse inquiry. Dissociated populations which no longer produced hormones at community bonding levels were taught to crave dopamine with increasingly violent and risk-taking behaviour, drugs and consumerism.

The same gratification conditioning is fed by addictions of all kinds, from drugs to addictive, harmful, and sometimes anti-social foods. The US military is developing an ‘anti-suicide’ hormonal nasal spray which is suppressing guilt, presumably through suppressing empathy, in militia members who have seen or committed atrocities. It is as ridiculous to deny the importance of stimulus choices in determining our social development as it would be to deny the importance of exercise choices in determining our muscle development. Seductive coercion and behaviour conditioning is present in every aspect of life worldwide. There is nothing at all new in this, it has always been this way. What is new is seductive coercion is now being controlled by an all-pervasive, sociopathic oligarchy who keep both their methods and their goals as state and corporate secrets and remove all choice from the society.

Freedom

“Social order at the expense of liberty is hardly a bargain.” – Marquis de Sade

The freedom espoused in the rhetoric surrounding both the French and US revolutions was a very anti-social freedom. What began as a rejection of the patriarchy or state, continued as a rejection of society and a promotion of extreme freedom for those best suited to a trade economy. The pursuit of happiness became a right of any who could command it through strength to survive in an economy completely rigged in favour of the small fraternity steering both the French and US revolutions. The hated patriarchy was overthrown and replaced by the fraternity, a decentralized patriarchy without the responsibility inherent in the role. Social approval was necessary for nothing as the fraternity used currency as their dissociated approval to command all of society’s benefits. Social obligation became so dissociated from the now monetized approval that it was left to the charitable intervention of the vilified patriarchal state and fought against alongside the rejection of the state.

The sex life of the Marquis de Sade is a perfect metaphor for the actions of both his compatriots at the Jacobin Club during the Terror and the sociopathic oligarchy of today. De Sade was against the death penalty and insisted no one should ever be found guilty for anything done in the pursuit of pleasure, while his idea of pleasure involved escalating levels of torture and murder of unwilling victims. Life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness was always intended for the fraternity only, and the rhetoric has never matched the actions toward any outside the fraternity.

In lieu of any other understanding of the nature of the motivations of our current sociopathic oligarchy, it is not unreasonable to expect they get the same gratification from the torture, murder and destruction of their day jobs as the Marquis de Sade did from his pursuit of pleasure. With the revelations of the current ‘child sex’ inquiry into the UK establishment death cult it seems almost certain they do. Those with sexual sadism disorder do not have to indulge in any behaviour that normative people would consider sex, and do not even have to be directly involved in an act, so it is very likely that ordering wars and mass guillotine executions worked just as well for their arousal as individual torture. For those with lesser power, ordering a snuff film would also work. It is impossible to look at the war horrors combined with media sexual imagery and not see the mirror image of the child torture and death cult and media sexualization of it.

The trade economy decreed that all was for sale and everyone has a right to anything they can purchase, with no social obligations. The requirement of approval from society is presented as a horror, social obligation is depicted as robbery. ‘Freedom’ advocates were outraged at the recent #takedownjulienblanc campaign because his anti-social behaviour was restricted by a societal right to associate or not and his currency approval was not enough to buy him acceptance and access to all the privileges of belonging to all the nations in the world.

Instead of researching known contributors to dissociative personality and behaviour, societies are encouraged to embrace dissociated behaviour as ‘diversity’ and ‘freedom’, to look for unconditional acceptance instead of understanding. Any suggestion of understanding or coercing individual behaviour triggers memories of CIA brain-washing, Clockwork Orange, or Thought Reform and produces revulsion in the same populations that accept the extremely coercive and behaviour-modifying death penalty. Talk of open, societal, behaviour coercion is greeted with the same horror that once followed any suggestion of heart or brain surgery. Meanwhile, those same agencies responsible for the earlier state horrors of behaviour modification experiments have progressed to the point that no one even acknowledges their coercive social engineering.

Free will is a deeply cherished myth for many. The idea that free will is real and social auto-coercion is an attack on freedom has allowed seductive coercion to be completely controlled by an invisible corporate oligarchy which modifies everyone’s behaviour through games, food, drugs, media, dissociative structures, anti-social laws, propaganda and more. Social approval has been replaced by currency, control of social coercion has been taken by an invisible oligarchy of intelligence and corporate propagandists, control of mental health has been usurped by those feeding drugs, foods and environmental conditions that cause mental disorders.

In the past, the practice of shunning was sometimes abused and there were always people considered lesser or not accepted into certain societies for reasons most would deem unfair. Any form of coercion that can be influenced by popularity or power is corruptible. Today, people who do not feel welcomed or appreciated by one society should have freedom of movement to join another. Societies which unfairly persecute one of their members are susceptible to being shunned themselves. In OpMaryville, Anonymous retaliated against a community which had shunned a rape victim and her family in favour of her far more locally powerful rapists. The BDS and BlockTheBoat campaigns allow outside nations (independently of states) to shun Israel for their genocidal and apartheid policies. Today we have the ability to provide an instant global appeal court for any individual who feels their rights are being violated by their society.

It is impossible to deny that those in power globally are both sadists and sociopaths. It would not be difficult to manage the world peacefully, with enough resources, autonomy for all and aid in times of disaster. It is not necessary to continue to destroy the environments we live in. The horrific and genocidal big three criminal industries of human, drugs and weapons trafficking are all enabled and run by those in power. It is not enough to replace the sociopaths in power, the system which created them rewards and creates both sadism and sociopathy. Nothing less than a completely new system with new social motivators and norms will remove sadism and sociopathy from the seats of power.

Seductive coercion is a constant in society. To reject social auto-coercion is to accept tyrannical secret coercion.

– – –

See also:

Free will and seductive coercion

Witches and how they were silenced

An economy for all

Society vs dissociation

Sociopaths, Psychopaths and Death Eaters

[1] Discussion of social hormones and the types of sexual and social interactions producing them is both grossly oversimplified and poorly cited here out of necessity. It is important to recognize their role in society, but studies are far too incomplete and contradictory to give any definitive statements or cite any particular study as a final authority. There are many other hormones and environmental combinations at work than those suggested here, and research and beliefs regarding the connection between sex and hormonal balance is found in many places outside science. In lieu of specific citations, I would encourage the interested reader to conduct independent research into Taoist sex, tantric sex, sex therapy, various forms of ritual magic, magick, satanism and other occult practises related to gaining power through sex, porn addiction, sex in advertising, oxytocin, dopamine, prolactin, androgens, seratonin, cortisol, endorphins and more. I do not endorse the claims found in any of those places. The point of this article is not to point to definitive answers but to suggest where we should be looking for them.

This article has been stigmergicly translated into French.

Sociopaths, Psychopaths and Death Eaters

It is now an undeniable fact that the UK establishment has, for decades, been run by people who tortured and killed children for entertainment, for political power, and just because they could.

The cognitive dissonance that statement produces in the majority of the population has provided the cloak of invisibility that has kept these people in power and their actions unpunished for all these years. When faced with an undeniable proof of any part of this, people’s shock was easily comforted by soothing assurances that the person was only one, that no one around him had been aware, that this would be taken care of. The idea of a society of torturing murderers, openly known to each other, controlling not just the UK but embedded in the upper echelons of many (if not all) countries was the stuff of conspiracy websites, those prolific disseminators of unbelievable truths well mixed with repellant bigotry and obvious falsehoods, presented as a whole to discredit all ingredients. Human trafficking is the largest criminal industry in the world. It is far less reasonable to believe it is conducted without the full knowledge and co-operation of those in power, but the power of deeply anti-social behaviour is how unwilling anyone is to believe another human is capable of it.

The propaganda arm of this international ring of torturers which attempted to normalize abuse of children and babies as ‘sex’ is still very apparent in the corporate media coverage of the CSA inquiry which depicts the torture and murder of children as “sex attacks on kids”, “child sex” or a “sex scandal”. Sex is not an attack. This is not sex. The fact that these people tortured and murdered children in their recreational hours does not make them simply pedosadists, or what corporate media still likes to call pedophiles in acquiescence to PIE’s demands that they be depicted as ‘child-lovers’. Their recreation may have revolved around torturing children, but their office hours as UK media and government establishment revolved around torture and mass murder of people from all demographics. It is not sufficient to call them psychopaths or sociopaths since very few of those seriously harm others and almost none to this extent. These people who want to be known as child lovers are death eaters. They feed on the agony of others. They torture and murder not because they have to, but because it feeds something in them. The only reason they are attracted to children is the increase in pain, horror, power, and taboo. They are no less attracted to mass slaughter than they are to the torture of children.

Sociopaths are attracted by what repels others. They seek filth, horror and destruction. Using the torture of children as bait to blackmail political opponents is a natural act for death eaters, as is destroying populations with ‘drug wars’ and ‘terrorism’ or using the slaughter of populations to advertise the weapons industry. People are products in the trade economy, and if death eaters are in control, people are their products to use as they wish. They are presiding over the destruction of the planet and beating back any who try to stop them because mass destruction is a compulsion for them.

The attempt to conflate torture and murder with sex is not unique to the UK establishment. “Our definition of sexy was something like Khadr.” said the man who decided to prosecute a tortured child. Militias in the DR Congo are promised magic power from raping women. Israel uses sexual imagery to promote the destruction of Palestine and rape is a constant in wars, torture, imprisonment, everywhere death eaters act. Death eaters gain power by manipulation of others. Hard coercion such as the control of military and police is theirs when they gain power, but until they have attained it they rely on seductive coercion. An insistence on hard coercion to control society is a denial of the power of seductive coercion. Conflation of torture and murder with sex is a perversion of that power. An attempt to depict deeply anti-social acts as sexual freedom is an attempt to normalize deeply anti-social behaviour.

Death eaters are not child lovers. Torture and murder are not a sex scandal. Sex is not an attack. Seductive coercion is used to create society. Its use in dissociated populations to incite acts of violence is a perversion of its power used against society.

Societal auto-immune disease

In industrialized states sociopathy is not only normal, it is normative. Industrialized society is the replacement of human relationships with corporations where people are products and human need is industry. To be dissociated from the approval economy is to be dissociated from society. A trade economy consists of sociopaths connected only by money. Antisocial personality is a natural trait of anyone who climbs to the top of a ponzi scheme built on systems of dissociation. Sociopaths cannot relate to others as human. They see them as products, the perfect outlook for success in the predatory trade economy.

Most definitions now define psychopaths as those born dissociated, and sociopaths as those created (and both categories are best used only for sweeping generalizations which this is). While psychopaths have always been with us, dissociated populations are producing sociopaths in unprecedented numbers. Huge populations of sociopaths and apathetics are necessary for death eaters to survive in power. ‘Shh, we need to torture children for your safety,’ say the death eaters and the sociopathic and apathetic public nods and turns away. Without the disinterested and complicit buffer, nothing would save the death eaters from the torches and pitchforks of those at the bottom.

Antisocial personality is a societal auto-immune disease. It manifests as the most obvious horrors in society. Self-identified narcissists, sociopaths and psychopaths generally would like theirs to be an accepted part of the spectrum of human behaviour, as PIE lobbied to have abusing babies an accepted ‘liberation’ in the 70s. Trying to divert focus from their anti-social behaviour to a discussion on sexual orientation is part of their continual efforts to normalize their behaviour or at least to divert attention to understanding for them instead of protection for their victims. Depicting action against them as a feminist attack on male normative sexuality is an appeal for both sympathy and broad acceptance and a dismissal of the existence of their victims.

If anti-social behaviour was widely accepted, society would not exist (as it largely does not today) and human and most other life on earth would not survive much longer. It is not logical to accept self-destruction as a normal part of society or evolution. We cannot kill sociopathy, it is part of us. Like cancer, it will probably always be a part of us in small amounts and it would be very unwise to attempt to eliminate it entirely. Humanity cannot divide neatly into these categories, and there are a variety of factors that cause dissociated behaviour, all ‘normal’ but all unacceptable in a society that wishes to continue existence.

The UK media depiction of the subjects of the so-called Child Sexual Abuse inquiry as paedophiles is a very deliberate propaganda exercise and attempt to manipulate public opinion. People who rape, torture and murder are not child lovers. The victims of these people were not only children. The phrase ‘paedophile’ brings the focus from the vicim to their assailant, and the pseudo-medical op-eds claim a right for understanding for death eaters, not the children. The use of the word paedophile individualizes the problem and is an attempt to pretend there are a ‘few bad apples’ instead of an entire ruling society complicit in the cover up and normalization of the torture and murder of others.

Societies do have the right to shun those who seek to destroy them. This fairly obvious principle has been perverted beyond all recognition by states who use it as an excuse to destroy others as they have perverted every other personal right to endorse corporate tyranny. States are highly militarized economic markets, not societies. Societies can shun harmful and anti-social behaviour in all forms, whether it is normal or not, as we do every day in all of our social norms. We do not need to build society according to an anti-social structure or create society that feeds anti-social behaviour at the top of the power structure. We do not need to accept death eaters as child lovers. We do not need to accept their hopeful norms in our coercive media propaganda.

Societies have the right to associate or to refuse to associate. 

This article has been stigmergicly translated into French and Spanish.

A mythical Manichean world

“I know there is a God because in Rwanda I shook hands with the devil.” ― Roméo Dallaire, Shake Hands With The Devil

In Shake Hands with the Devil, Romeo Dallaire, former head of the UN mission to Rwanda, described shaking hands with commanders of the Hutu militias responsible for the 1994 Tutsi genocide. He felt he was in the presence of evil, or, to his Christian outlook, the devil. When faced with incomprehensible savagery it is hard to find human nature behind it and natural to look for some invisible hand of evil. The same outlook is understandable to some in west African countries, where the leaders have for years been suspected of complicity in ritual killings, or torturing their own citizens and using their body parts as amulets for power. Compulsory membership of politicians in certain Masonic lodges and the undeniable power and wealth wielded by the powerful, support both the cult rumours and the presumed effectiveness of evil forces being invoked. These so-called powers are also sought by some militias.

If a person is thought to embody evil in themselves, the person is demonized in the eyes of the other. Once a large group has designated another entire group as evil, actions no longer matter. The ensuing war will have nothing to do with good actions and bad actions and everything to do with one side exterminating the other. Those facing the side designated as evil are then depicted as Good, and any behaviour of theirs will be justified thereafter as can be seen in the excuses made for Rwanda actions even today. Some groups can carry their indestructible Good status in the face of all evidence of their actions for generations and against completely different opponents, as we see with Israel and the fact that they still have defenders justifying their ‘right’ to torment and murder others.

Countries that have had an acknowledged atrocity are much more self aware and able to recognize and stop new ones. If an atrocity is outside the Overton window of what a people will believe about themselves they will deny it happened or ignore it. For Canadians, the pull of the manufactured self-image of ‘nice’ is too attractive to confront, even when faced with human rights and environmental disasters Canada is responsible for worldwide. To acknowledge that global mining atrocities are a fundamental part of Canada, that a Canadian child has now been tortured and imprisoned for the thirteenth year, that these actions cannot be blamed on one government but are part of Canada itself, is an attack on their self-image that many Canadians refuse to face. The US was previously the same with their acceptance of ‘freedom’ propaganda and their refusal to see their own police state as anything but protection.

A good guy / bad guy, personality based morality is very helpful for any who wish to wage wars or destroy the lives of others. No one has to think, just identify the Good Guys and the Bad Guys, be for the one, beware the other. We really don’t need legions of security analysts, militaries and intelligence to sort out Good Guys from Bad Guys. Bad Guys are destroying, killing, enslaving and robbing, Good Guys are creating, researching and caring for others. Bad Guys are capable of becoming Good Guys as soon as they stop the actions harmful to society and start the ones helpful to society.

The myth of free will and the myth of equality

I was one of those children forced into fighting at the age of 13, in my country Sierra Leone, a war that claimed the lives of my mother, father and two brothers. I know too well the emotional, psychological and physical burden that comes with being exposed to violence as a child or at any age for that matter. – Ishmael Beah

In order to designate someone as evil and deserving of any horror that the powerful wish to inflict on them, they must be held personally responsible for the actions of themselves and their ‘side’. In order to hold people personally responsible even for their own actions, the public must believe they had free will, something that does not exist. The idea of personal responsibility also depends on an assumption that people have equal access to information and the ability to process it. Propaganda and coercion which comes from the top is denied and blame is cast to those at the bottom who acted upon it. The propaganda masters convince the public that the weak-minded and the vulnerable must take responsibility for acting as the zombie army of the powerful who are absolved of responsibility.

For punishment to be applied equally to all, the public must believe that all are equal, which is also falseThe myth of equality is essential for sustaining this binary outlook and careful censoring of information is essential to maintaining the myth of equality. ‘Hamas is evil, bomb Gaza’ cannot stand in the face of relentless social media pictures of babies, beautiful children and wonderful people well-known to the online community being blown up by Israel. ‘Boko Haram is evil, Nigeria military should kill them all’  is shocked by images of little boys fighting and being killed on both sides or Nigeria military torturing a little girl working for Boko Haram. Hillary Clinton deplores the loss of imperial control over information and Netanyahu bitterly calls his victims “telegenically dead“. The old media control which depicted all enemies of militias as adult men with guns was essential to justify any war.

We have a tendency to think of our villains as geniuses or assume they at least have the ability to predict the outcome of their actions but for those filling prisons and dying in wars that is not always the case.

While most people recognize the ability to rehabilitate child soldiers, what of those who are not rehabilitated? If they do not bear responsibility as children, why does the responsibility for their formation descend upon them as adults? How can anyone presume to know what has happened to the mind of anyone who has lived completely different experiences than them and possesses a completely different mind?

If it is agreed that charges should only be applied to criminals who have attained a certain standard of cognitive ability, why is the same penalty applied to all at that point? If the spectrum of ability and advantage continues above the line labeled competent, should the penalties not be a corresponding spectrum? If they must attain a standard of cognitive ability, why are moral imbeciles judged by the same standards as the socially normative? Why is sociopathy not recognized as a mental illness if insanity is? What if sociopathy is a physical disease? What of those with fetal alcohol syndrome and other forms of physical brain damage that currently fill prisons and militias?

The role of drugs in convincing militias to commit atrocities and overcome guilt is seldom reported. Not only non-state militias employ drugs, the US military even has a follow up anti-guilt nasal spray to prevent troops from feeling natural remorse.

Not all opponents are worthy of hate.

Social auto-coercion

Few believe that all of their own ancestors should have been wiped out, but everyone has ancestors who displayed what we like to call inhuman characteristics. Why do we believe they are absolved from the personal responsibility we bear today if not because we accept the power of social coercion and social norms? If social coercion and social norms applied in the past, why is their power denied today? The US government acknowledged the power of seductive coercion with what they cynically called the battle for hearts and minds in Iraq. They of all people understand coercion and knew that their actions would have the opposite affect.

Any suggestion of deliberate social auto-coercion is met with howls from free will advocates, especially from the US, that bastion of personal freedoms perverted to suit corporate ends. Every intelligence agency in the world, all corporations and all militaries constantly manipulate public norms and behaviour, but an attempt for a community to regain control is depicted (by corporate media) as an attack on freedom and autonomy instead of the assertion of it.

People can somehow become convinced that if we only kill enough people, inherent goodness will shine from the survivors. In the end, we can’t kill enough people to make the world a kinder gentler place. We have proven enough times that there is no time and place immune to an outbreak of human savagery. UN peacekeeping is incompetent, political, and after the fact. We need societies resilient to violence. In the end we will need to understand each other and use social auto-coercion as we do after the horrors of every war in order to return to normal life. We need to start using it before the outbreak of any violence, not to stop Bad Guys but to stop bad actions. Instead of spending vast sums tracking individuals and their connections in the search for Bad Guys, we need to strengthen social auto-coercion and fight the coercion coming from sociopathic power.

For those who insist societies will never function without military and police hard coercion, societies worldwide did, very well. For those, usually the same people, who insist that seductive coercion is immoral, seductive coercion is what creates a society out of a group of disconnected people. For those who do not believe that coercion ought to be in the hands of the people, coercion ought never to be anywhere else. The only way to prevent coercion by a secret oligarchy is to use it as community.

“If we don’t harness their potential for good, their societies will continue to reap their capacity for evil.” ― Roméo Dallaire, They Fight Like Soldiers, They Die Like Children

Roméo Dallaire, Shake Hands With The Devill: The Failure of Humanity in Rwanda (2003)

Ishmael Beah, Long Way Gone: Memoirs of a Boy Soldier (2007)

Roméo Dallaire, They Fight Like Soldiers, They Die Like Children (2010)

This article has been stigmergicly translated into French. 

The revolutionaries

The last shall be the first and the first last. – Frantz Fanon

The objective of a revolutionary is to keep everything exactly as it was but replace those in power with themselves, to become what they hate, to gain the approval of those they despise. The mark of a successful revolutionary is recognition and acceptance into the circles of oppressors.

A typical revolutionary is driven by a desire for justice and no imagination. They can see injustice, they see oppressors and oppressed, and they follow the obvious impulse to reverse the two without changing the system that allows for oppression. Revolution almost always sounds like a new system because revolutionaries almost always call themselves The People, or at least The [oppressed category] People, but in practice there is no change. Revolution follows a Good Guy / Bad Guy, Manichean morality and the goal is to kill all the Bad Guys until there is nothing left but Good Guys. Fanon replaces white with black, Marx replaces master with worker, no one replaces the paradigm. Malcolm X and Robert Mugabe desired a perfect negative image of the apartheid state. Feminists celebrate ‘what women have achieved’ along their path to be exactly like caucasian men.

A revolutionary outlook is binary. They see themselves, as they are usually elite or part of the large, cohesive block of powerful commoners required to keep the ruling class in power, and they see the ruling class. Anyone else is outside their consideration and will remain so. “I know nothing about her,” [1] says Fanon of indigenous African women as he derides the work where they detail their experience and describes the revolutionary desire to be a white woman’s master. Marx sees those below the proletariat and calls them “The “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society.” [2] When Marx speaks of the abolition of class, he means the abolition of all class except the proletariat.

Since people are never binary, revolutionary theory almost immediately has to start addressing the classification problem, who is black, who is white, who is bourgeoise or proletariat, who is male or female, and the rush to be at the extreme end of your side creates a new class war within the class war. If the last shall be first, the almost last have a new fight to be last. “Since the sole motto of the bourgeoisie is “Replace the foreigner,” … the “small people” of the nation… will be equally quick to insist that the Dahomans go home to their own country, or will even go further and demand that the Foulbis and the Peuhls return to their jungle or their mountains”[3]

If, as Fanon said, “The black man wants to be white”[1] then the justice sought is a very personal justice, for themselves only as Malcolm X proposed in his desire for a new black state within the US which would leave indigenous and others as unseen as always. Colonized revolutionaries seek to decolonize by becoming the colonizers as women seek to end subjection to men by entering masculinist establishment. Even if they have no wish to enslave their former masters, the revolutionary oppressed wish to master someone, to sit atop the patriarchy, to claim their turn as a matter of justice. As long as the paradigm remains, it matters not at all if those on top become the former oppressed, they are just branch managers for the empire and oppression continues uninterrupted. In no way did it make the world a better place or change the paradigm for the better to have Barack Obama as Commander in Chief of the world’s largest military or Condoleeza Rice as US Secretary of State. In no way did women holding 56% of the seats in Rwanda’s parliament, or having Louise Mushikiwabo, as Rwanda’s Minister of Foreign Affairs & Cooperation, make Rwanda a kinder, gentler state. In the end, the problems were not tied to gender, race or class, but to the paradigm itself.

In the middle of a revolutionary frenzy it is unwise to point out that oppressed may become oppressors as they are the Good Guys who must never be accused of wrongdoing, but we really don’t need any more Israels or Rwandas to prove the point. ‘You can’t be racist/sexist against the oppressor!’ shrieks the illogic from the revolutionary top, and any who question it are condemned as reactionary, racist and sexist regardless of their race or sex. Those lower in the revolutionary ponzi scheme of power are permitted be part of the revolution only by exact adherence to the utterances of power. Deviance is dangerous in a binary world.

Since the new power wants to be exactly like the old power, continuing revolutions have created a world where everyone of every race and gender strove to prove they were the same as powerful caucasian men. A world where everyone sought the top of the ponzi schemes of power, celebrity and wealth, where their desperate effort towards the centre created the centripetal force that kept the Great Men in power, that upheld the ponzi scheme of empire for all these years. Everyone is defined in relation to the caucasian man of power. It is the revolutionaries as much as the reactionaries that refuse to let the old system go.

A dual spotlight and those in the shadows

The history of revolution is the history of Great Men overthrowing Great Men. The revolutionary stories of oppression tell of the oppressiveness of unsated envy and covetousness. The glory that follows these revolutions is the glory of the new Great Man. Unheard forever are those condemned to just get on with it, the so-called lumpenproles who are understandably disinterested in who is currently atop the ponzi scheme they have no entrance to. 

Fanon overlooked completely the effect of European patriarchy meeting matriarchal societies and what that did to class relations between men and women. He exhaustively examines European attraction to African indigenous men but he speaks not at all of any attraction to African indigenous women despite admitting almost all mixed race children had indigenous mothers. He attributes European fear of the African to a repressed homosexuality in the men and a desire to be raped in the women, but finds no such cause in the Antilleans fear of the Senegalese. Everything pivots around the point at which he exists. His myopic, binary gaze at the balance of power between African and European in a patriarchy disregarded the imposition of the patriarchy in the first place. Fanon described men who wished to overthrow other men and sit in their place.

Marx ignored the fact that his proletariats were part of a system of dissociation that recognized as workers only those who served the powerful, not those who served the weak or themselves. He also wanted to overthrow the oppressor without acknowledging the first oppressed or the true size of the oppressive structure itself. His ambition to flip the proletariat with their masters required that autonomous individuals be locked in an even more solid and cohesive block of commoners than before. His failure to recognize the block of commoners as a creation of oligarchy caused him and all communists after to strengthen the club which held oligarchy in place.

Engels felt women lost their social power due to their loss of property ownership[4] instead of seeing that property ownership was created to remove their social power. The masculinist lens of Engels and Morgan was used to reinterpret matriarchal indigenous cultures as communist, as societies where everyone was assigned property and a place in society as birthright instead of as social approval. This owned property and its allocation must then be controlled by a patriarchal power or mini-state. The approval of First Nations women that for generations was essential, was suddenly to be disregarded as men were taught that to be a man meant to humiliate and degrade their own source of approval. The vicious degradation of women in formerly matrilineal societies served to destroy not just the old power but the old structure. Indigenous women were now last, their approval was replaced by control of currency, and colonial government structure was taken over by property thieves both petty and grand. Autonomy for First Nations in Canada now means following a colonial construct of band councils revolving around communist allocation of funds and property in formerly (mostly) moneyless gifting cultures. Management of nations no longer includes the most important authority, acceptance or rejection of individuals from the nation.

A perpetual motion pendulum of revolution

As long as it is people, not actions, which are classified as Good and Evil, we will maintain a perpetual motion pendulum of revolution. As every revolution is a simple reaction to the initial action, they are mirror images. Slave morality is a reaction to master morality, revolutionary militias are a reaction to a police state, feminism is a reaction to masculinism, men with guns are a reaction to men with guns. The centripetal force that creates power also creates the centrifugal force that destroys it. In every case, reactions will become what they destroy.

If you define yourself in relation to your enemy, you’ve lost. You cannot believe armed militias are a solution unless you believe in the worth or inevitability of a police state. You cannot be a Feminist without endorsing the gendered world of the Masculinist. The death penalty for murder reaffirms the right to murder. Mirrored reactions are a result of a lack of imagination to see outside the paradigm we live within. A reaction adds force to the initial action. Overthrow by men with guns will be followed with rule by men with guns. Justice through institutionalized bigotry will result in institutionalized bigotry. “The violence of the colonial regime and the counter-violence of the native balance each other and respond to each other in an extraordinary reciprocal homogeneity.”[3] We will have equilibrium when we step off the pendulum.

Those that protest the revolution are told they must be reactionaries. Any criticism of the left brutality and you must support the right brutality. Self-professed US anti-imperialists are even more rigid than the imperialists because they discovered the second spotlight and think they’ve seen all that there is. Those that scream for solidarity ‘on the same side’ attempt to hide the fact that a ponzi scheme has no sides, only a top and bottom. They will cling to the messiahs of revolution and support revolutionary ponzi schemes until it becomes absolutely indisputable that the two are one again. As the revolution fights for and wins seats on the same panels and the same international bodies as the reaction, the same dark alliance is formed once more. Empire remains intact.

Revolutionary replacement of authority will co-opt resistance. Revolution looks up not down. It seeks approval and acceptance from the spotlight, not the shadows. Not only does revolution not bring change, it brings progression down the same path and frequently widens the window of acceptable oppression. All revolution has simply entrenched and strengthened the hierarchy of power, all revolutions will need to be followed by more revolutions unless they are immediately replaced with resistance.

Between reaction and revolution there is nothing to choose. Neither leave the track, they just allow different people to drive while the same people are run over.

Revolution fights tyrants, resistance fights tyranny

It is not revolution we need, another turn of the same wheel along the same path, it is resistance. Resistance uses the tyrant’s own power against them rather than strengthening that power by reaction. Resistance fights all forms of oppression and bigotry regardless of source by building and defending a tolerant society. Resistance to patriarchy is not feminism, it is removal of masculinism. Resistance to bigotry is not bigotry, it is diversity and tolerance. Resistance to capitalism is not unions, it is dismantling of the trade economy. It is not enough to weed, a new system must be planted or the old seeds of tyranny will instantly grow again.

Oppressive power of the size in place today will not be removed by the creation of revolutionary power. Even if one chooses to think a new leader would stop the oppression it is no longer in the power of a leader or leaders. Mass disobedience and a refusal to acknowledge the authority of the powerful are the only hope to collapse the current empire.

Anyone who occupies the old places of power in a hierarchical ponzi scheme is an enemy of those below, even if they just fought alongside them and ‘earned’ their place. It is the position that is the enemy and it must be constantly collapsed by a removal of support from every ponzi scheme of celebrity, wealth and power. It is not enough to remove oppressors, the system of oppression must be dismantled. 

– – –

[1] Fanon, Frantz, Black Skin, White Masks (Peau noire, masques blancs, 1952

[2] Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, The Communist Manifesto (Das Kommunistische Manifest), 1848

[3] Fanon, Frantz, The Wretched of the Earth (Les Damnés de la Terre), Grove Press, 1961

[4] Friedrich Engels, The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State: in the light of the researches of Lewis H. Morgan (Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigenthums und des Staats) 1884

This article has been stigmergicly translated into French.

The reactionaries

There are people in this world who do not want the systems of dissociation removed, the oligarchs dethroned and the principles that govern us rewritten. Some of those are people who know things are never so bad they can’t get worse. Some do not see the box they are in or a different way of living. Some are those advantaged by the current structure, now or in the recent past.

We can all spot reactionaries when they take the form of extreme nationalists fighting against immigration or against anyone from a different ethnicity, religion, gender or similar, but today the loudest voices calling for revolution are equally reactionary. The very fact that their voices are the loudest under the current system is reason enough that they don’t want to change the paradigm. A longing for tradition and nostalgia for the good old days, advocacy for reform, and focus on issues instead of underlying principles, all indicate the speaker is from a demographic only lately inconvenienced by the system.  

Anyone fighting for a reform or a reversal of the current system is a reactionary. Anyone objecting to one bill or victim at a time instead of universal principles is only objecting to one manifestation of a problem and that is the one which affects themselves. The principles we are ruled by were created to advantage an elite few and no matter how far back their effects are rewound, if the principles remain the same the elite few will recur and the ponzi schemes of wealth, celebrity and power will continue. Anyone wanting an effect of the principles reversed but not the principles themselves is asking for a personal exemption to a situation they have no problem seeing others living in. Their objective is to go back far enough that the whole process can continue again in the same way, rewinding only the parts where it became uncomfortable for them. As soon as other people’s problems are mentioned they become ‘realists’ who don’t want to ‘tackle the whole world’ at once (ever) just the part with them in it. They do not want to dismantle the structure or keep the door open, they just want to scuttle in themselves before it shuts. 

Exceptional lives

Those enjoying media spotlight for being questioned at international airports without mentioning the stateless masses in prisons, floating on oceans and being murdered by traffickers and fascists are co-opting and minimizing the global horror of militarized closed borders. US military personnel protesting US military force only when it is used in the streets of the US are saying they fought for their exceptional position in the ponzi scheme and they want to retain it. A US thermidor is far more likely than a US revolution as anyone who has enjoyed the sight of ‘anarchists’ demanding allegiance to their constitution can tell.

Occupy Sandy was a grass roots campaign which many inside the US Occupy movement considered their greatest achievement and many outside considered most illustrative of everything wrong with US Occupy. Sandy was one hurricane, occurring in one region, and US Occupy completely obliterated the voices of those dying in the Caribbean with their pleas for Hallowe’en candy for the children of Manhattan. All efforts to expand the action to include those outside the US with far greater need were ignored or dismissed as unrealistic and not their concern. While regional actions like Opsafewinter are required and have local variants worldwide, to co-opt one issue and section off only the part that concerns your own state is as nationalist and reactionary as any fascist fighting immigration.

The exact same US based social media accounts who built their platforms by appropriating everyone’s protests and revolutions, broadcasting information from others as if it was their own and fundraising to send themselves as war tourists to gain celebrity by broadcasting over top of local voices suddenly went into hard reversal when they had a protest of their own, calling for all of their hugely powerful circle to attack anyone outside the US attempting to discuss ‘their’ protest. The worst backlash was for those who dared compare a struggle in the US with one outside. While every conflict of any kind in the continent of Africa is happily billed by US pundits as ‘the next Rwanda’, pointing out that Israeli trained police were throwing US produced tear gas in the streets of both Palestine and the US was unacceptable co-opting of ‘their’ protest. They have no desire to stop tear gas production or dismantle the US or Israeli military, they simply want their exceptional status back. When they fight against minimum wage, they identify with the workers in Australia, not those in Bangladesh. The policies of trickle down economics they deplore for themselves are what they prescribe for the rest of the world.

Those in Ferguson fighting for the safety of their neighbourhood are part of a global movement against police and military violence worldwide. Those furious that Palestinians have pointed this out are imperialist exceptionalists demanding a global spotlight on them and only them. These are the same people, with the same mindset, who feel that three killed in Boston is worth far more media than thousands in Nigeria, that thousands killed in the US trade towers is worth hundreds of thousands killed in Iraq. Self governance is choosing who and what to amplify. Those demanding or taking greater amplification seek to be part of the oligarchy, not to dismantle it. They are not revolution, they are not resistance, they are simply reaction.

Panelists, the new politicians

The 2012 US NDAA caused an international uproar as exceptional lives used their exceptional media power to convince the world of the importance of this bill, which extended to citizens of the United States the same threat of indefinite detention that had been a fact for all non-citizens of the US since the passage of the Patriot Act in 2001. In a wonderfully ironic twist, a very wealthy caucasian woman from New York (employed by her very wealthy stepfather) gave laughably false testimony that her interview with Guantanamo child detainee Omar Khadr (who she states is a member of al-Qaeda, with no evidence or background knowledge of the case whatsoever) put her at such risk that she refrained from publishing the interview out of fear of the NDAA. Omar Khadr has yet to be interviewed by anyone to this day and she had absolutely no authority over publication or anything else on the site she is claiming to have censored. I was the person fully responsible for all editorial and administrative decisions on the site she references and also for assigning interviews. I actually did censor an explosive interview I conducted around Omar Khadr which had absolutely nothing to do with her. Both Omar Khadr and myself were put at risk eleven years prior by the Patriot Act, and he had spent the last decade in hell due to the fact that this nightmare already existed for everyone but herself and other US citizens. This fact was completely ignored along with all of her other easily disproven false testimony in the hysteria surrounding the NDAA. An exceptional life appropriated the work and position of one and exploited the tragedy of another, both under real threat from the Patriot Act, and used it to wrap themselves in the aura of faux-persecution so essential to a position on the speaking circuit.

The Congolese who died fighting M23 in 2013 had their efforts neatly lifted and sold by the US based NGO Falling Whistles, which told their donors that their Twitter campaign, funded by selling sterling silver whistles, was responsible for reclaiming the areas of the DRC overtaken by a well armed militia that was only eventually countered by UN and state forces combined. In early 2011, I reported a story as it happened involving a Yemeni journalist ordered imprisoned by Obama for publishing the truth about US drone strikes in Yemen. My sources for the story were Amnesty and Yemeni bloggers, all well documenting the case at great personal risk. A year and a half later, Jeremy Scahill published the same story, celebrated by the old boy circle of US journalists as a coup of investigative journalism and an exclusive scoop. Scahill’s Wikipedia page contained almost nothing but this story with no mention that it had been well documented a year and a half earlier. When the earlier stories were pointed out to Greenwald by Wikileaks, he ignored and continued the same ill-placed hype around his friend that had led to his own success. Kony 2012, One Million Rising, and endless other NGOs and Thought Leaders made 2012 a lucrative year for those selling other people’s tragedy and resistance. Other people are simply a product to sell for celebrity, wealth and power, activism is just the all important panel seat.

The NSA is hardly the only intelligence agency spying on The People if The People are the world. Neither are the anti-NSA activists heroes if they are only disclosing that which violates their own privacy and keeping the rest secure in the name of ‘national security’. Anyone supporting ‘national’ security of the corporate empire which terrorizes, murders and enslaves the world is an enemy of the people, not a hero.

People with massive platforms act as gates to keep the real disadvantaged from power instead of bridges to ensure all voices are heard. This appropriation of the voices and stories of others is called assistance but those they assist are really just marketing gimmicks to aid in their own quest for celebrity, power and wealth. This sickness is now spreading to every part of the world as the Great Men reach out to lesser Great Men who fight first for the uniqueness of their group and then beat back their comrades as if they are the only representatives of that uniqueness needed. It is a ponzi scheme, if they rise, the rest will not. Because these people see tragedy and need as a product to feed off of and a highly lucrative path to the all-important panel seat, they compete for causes like old corporate media competes for stories. Victims are hoarded like sources, that so very apt term for the vampire-like tendencies of narcissistic old journalism. More online energy is devoted to wars over who started a hashtag than the problem the hashtag was meant to highlight. Problems cease to be problems when they reach a level the reactionaries are comfortable with. Noam Chomsky introduces the concepts of ‘normal torture’ and ‘serious torture’ and is happy that the levels at Guantanamo have reached normal

There are no sides, just a top and a bottom. No one on the top is a friend of anyone on the bottom. People from all the right demographics tweet that they are being repressed to scratch their way up onto a panel but once they have themselves firmly planted in a panel seat they will never look at anyone beneath them. They sigh and talk about ‘broke activists’ if confronted with others in need when they are far less broke than all those they claim to represent. If they were looking up before, they will continue their gaze upwards, sitting on panels in suits and starting NGOs and using those below as marketing product. Once they have stolen the voices below them to build their platform, they will defend it as their personal power and use it solely to present the most inoffensive pap to not lose their mainstream acceptance.

Ponzi schemes don’t trickle down, they siphon up.

Anti-imperialism but not really

The global elite cry “We should fix our problems at home!” but empire, communist internationalists and the so-called Islamic State are all borderless. Act local pretends that all goals are the same and what is good for one locality must bring good to others, but the nature of the ponzi scheme ensures that what feeds one, bleeds others. Self-professed ‘anti-imperialists’ pretend the empire starts when bombs start dropping and ignore the bomb manufacturers and the trade economy created to prop up dictators against the people’s will. Global warming and environmental destruction by multi-national corporations don’t know borders but when their victims seek refuge in the states which destroyed their homes they are killed and imprisoned and the reactionary population murmurs completely meaningless phrases like ‘it’s just not feasible’.

Nationalists pretending they are anti-imperialists pretend we live in a bi-polar, left-right world. We have a top down world with a core mafia cartel and outlying splinter mafias. Neutrality, especially by those at the top who are supporting the ponzi scheme, does not just help the oppressor, it is neutrality by the oppressor.

If anti-imperialists are truly anti-imperialist they will empty Coke products which were all violently stolen from others. They will stop Areva, the global blight which destroys Niger to power France. They will block Zim, the Israeli shipping firm allowed to profit off of the US funded Israeli occupation of Palestine, as the true anti-imperialists in the US have done. They will share copyrighted and patented material and dismantle their weapons industry. They will share their megaphone, not to speak for others but to amplify them. Anyone who has an exceptional life they are willing to risk could use it not to collect donations and media attention for themselves to appropriate another’s cause but to attract attention to their cause for them. The international human shields in the Gaza hospital who joined Gazans in solidarity as equals and risked their lives to attract a media spotlight showed international solidarity and respect. A UK livestreamer tastelessly exploiting Gaza tragedy and putting their lives at risk to feed his own celebrity did not.

Action to help people in need in a local neighbourhood is not reactionary until it is silencing others affected by the same problem. OpSafeWinter is not reactionary, it is part of a global autonomous resistance network of similar local initiatives. Occupy Sandy, which took all of the attention from the devastation of one hurricane and pulled the entire spotlight onto those least affected was embarrassingly reactionary. People in the streets of Ferguson and other US cities protesting police violence are acting locally. People in the US calling for the end of US military equipment being used on The People, only themselves, instead of an end to US military being used on any people, are reactionary. 

Anyone saying it is not realistic to look at others in a worse position than themselves, or trying to partition the same problem to address only the part which affect themselves, is a reactionary. Even if just in the rhetoric, solidarity with the full problem must be acknowledged and the megaphone must be shared or there is no global solidarity. Instead of expending all their energy fighting to protect their exceptional status they could recognize the common struggle they share with the exact same enemies as everyone else and instead of trying to lower the bar just far enough to get themselves over it they could remove it. The minimum wage workers in the US could recognize their common struggle is not with the minimum wage workers in Australia but those in Bangladesh, and instead of trying to scratch their way to the top of the ponzi scheme they could use their position already near the top to remove support and dismantle it. The massive and disproportional megaphone given to citizens of the US is to be shared. If it is not shared it should be taken.

Endless fights to pass or block laws recognizes the authority of the state and judiciary, exhausts activists and is a losing game. There is no adjustment to a trade economy possible that will not recreate the exact same situation we are in now. There is no master that will be benevolent and no messiah who will save us. Reform is not possible.

To create a new paradigm, we have to start at the bottom. The bottom is where the principles we live under failed first, it is the canary that predicts the future for all. We live in a world where some being delayed at the airport is considered a gross violation of civil liberties but others being tortured and killed so their own elected leaders can use their body parts as a good luck fetish is not a newsworthy topic. Invasion of privacy is a pimple on the face of the beast killing children in ritual murders to bring good luck for heads of state. Both are manifestations of an empire that thinks it owns its citizens, that they are products to be used for whatever whim the powerful choose, from props in weapons advertising to product for the prison industrial complex. Hysterics over the pimple while leaving the dragon intact will obviously lead to more pimples that will offend even the most privileged.